Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin has dismissed claims that his tenure as Minority Leader was marked by disorder, asserting instead that his leadership was defined by discipline, strategy, and unity within the caucus.
Addressing attendees at the launch of a scholarship scheme for Members of Parliament on Monday, November 17, 2025, Bagbin noted that although the Minority faced intense national challenges during his time in leadership, the group remained focused and coordinated in handling parliamentary affairs.
He explained that perceptions of chaos under his leadership were largely the result of a highly charged political climate rather than any internal dysfunction among Minority members.
Bagbin also refuted assertions by Minority Leader Afenyo-Markin that he drew inspiration from Bagbin’s leadership style, describing the claims as inaccurate.
He pointed out that the caucus was often under pressure due to major legislative battles, economic issues, and heightened public scrutiny.
“What the Minority Leader is doing now is not what I did. He has expressed to you people that he took inspiration from my report. Please go and read my report. I never, on the floor, raised my voice. I never, on the floor, tried to show a certain power, no,” Bagbin said.
He stressed that during his tenure, the Minority Caucus adopted clear strategies, maintained open communication, and worked collectively to hold the government to account.
Disagreements within parliamentary groups, he added, are normal and should not be misconstrued as evidence of disorder.
“I study the political environment, test the pulse of the people, and then you play along with that. I didn’t do what you are doing,” he added.
Bagbin further highlighted the strong collaboration that existed between him and his leadership team, saying their ability to manage diverse viewpoints contributed significantly to the stability of the caucus.
Reflecting on his career trajectory from Minority Leader to Speaker of Parliament, he noted that the experience deepened his understanding of parliamentary democracy and strengthened his capacity to guide the House.
He urged the public to recognise the complexities of parliamentary leadership, emphasising that robust debate and internal deliberations are hallmarks of a healthy democracy, not signs of chaos.
