Ghana is a secular state, proudly upholding religious freedom and peaceful coexistence among its diverse peoples from every nook and cranny of the country.
For decades, we have thrived without allowing religious or tribal differences to divide our peaceful coexistence.
Yet, as we approach critical leadership choices, some voices seek to inject unnecessary division by emphasising a candidate’s religion or ethnic background over their ability to solve the nation’s pressing problems. This must stop.
In the 21st century, Ghana deserves leaders selected purely on competence, problem-solving skills, and vision, not on faith, tribe, ethnicity, or minority status.
Historically, Ghana, once known as the Gold Coast, had African Traditional Religion as its dominant faith long before external influences arrived.
European missionaries introduced Christianity, and later, Arab traders brought Islam. Over time, these two religions gained prominence as many traditional worshippers converted.
However, no single religion can claim exclusive “ownership” of Ghana or define what makes someone a “true Ghanaian.” Our identity as Ghanaians transcends religious labels.
Traditional believers, Christians, and Muslims are all integral to our national fabric.
Since independence, all of Ghana’s presidents have been Christians, yet the perennial challenges facing our nation, such as economic hardships, infrastructure deficits, youth unemployment, and more, persist.
We have never had a president from the African Traditional Religion community or a Muslim leader. This pattern shows that religious affiliation alone does not guarantee effective governance. What matters is the leader’s ability to deliver results.
Consider the current discourse surrounding Dr Mahamudu Bawumia, a capable public servant and vice president who happens to be Muslim.
Some oppose his potential leadership simply because of his faith, with one prominent cleric even drawing an absurd parallel to a “descendant of Ishmael” governing Israel. Ghana is not Israel, and such comparisons are not only weird but irrelevant and divisive.
No one chooses their religion at birth; Dr Bawumia did not “ask” to be born a Muslim, just as no Christian chooses their faith. God creates us as we are.
Targeting a qualified individual solely because of their religious background is not only unfair but also regressive, and must not be entertained.
In an era when advanced nations prioritise leaders who tackle real issues, such as poverty, climate change, education, healthcare, and economic growth, Ghana cannot afford to lag behind by fixating on trivial matters like religion or tribe.
Global progress demands problem-solvers who think on their feet, innovate, and unite people toward common goals.
We must join the world in yearning for 21st-century leaders who transcend ethnic, tribal, or religious divisions and focus on tangible solutions that add value to every citizen’s life.
Let us reject the notion that only a Christian, or someone from a particular tribe, ethnic group, or majority tribe can lead Ghana effectively.
Such thinking is selfish, outdated, and risks marring our hard-earned harmony. Instead, let us evaluate leaders based on the following:
Competence and track record: Proven ability to manage complex issues and deliver results.
Problem-solving skills: Capacity to think critically and adapt to modern challenges.
Inclusivity and unity: Commitment to serving all Ghanaians, regardless of background.
Ghana has come of age as a mature democracy. We cannot allow selfish individuals to exploit religion or ethnicity for personal or political gain.
Our peaceful coexistence is a treasure; let us protect it by choosing leaders who rise above division and focus on building a prosperous future for all.
In 2024 and beyond, let competence be our guide. Ghana deserves nothing less than a progressive leader who believes in problem-solving.
By Adjei Worlanyo Frank
