By Bright Kelvin Afeku
Addressing today’s conflicts presents several problems for the United Nations (UN), which was founded in 1945 with the goals of fostering international cooperation and ensuring peace and security.
Two examples of these difficulties are the wars between Russia and Ukraine and Israel and Hamas.
The UN finds it difficult to prevent and end these conflicts in spite of its substantial resources and moral authority for a variety of reasons, such as operational difficulties, structural constraints, and geopolitical dynamics.
With the help of up-to-date sources, this investigation explores these factors in depth.
Geopolitical Dynamics
The Veto Power of the Permanent Five (P5)
The veto power possessed by the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (P5), namely the United States, Russia, China, France, and the United Kingdom, is a major impediment to the UN’s capacity to put an end to conflicts such as the wars between Israel and Hamas and Russia and Ukraine.
Any of these nations can use this authority to obstruct any substantive resolution, regardless of the Security Council’s majority opinion. For example, the UN’s reaction to the Russia-Ukraine war is greatly influenced by Russia’s status as a P5 member.
Russia has vetoed multiple Security Council resolutions calling for a ceasefire and denouncing its actions since the war began in 2014 and escalated in 2022.
The issue continues because the Security Council is essentially unable to act decisively against Russia due to its veto power.
Similar to this, the Biden’s administration has routinely used its veto power in the Israel-Hamas conflict to thwart resolutions that criticize Israel. A Security Council resolution, for instance, that demanded an immediate truce between Israel and Hamas was vetoed by the US in May 2021 due to concerns about bias against Israel and the need for a more impartial approach.
The intricate geopolitical alignments and the impact of national interests on UN decision-making are reflected in this usage of the veto power.
Geopolitical Alliances and Rivalries
The UN’s attempts to resolve crises are further complicated by geopolitical rivalries and alliances.
The dynamics of the conflict and the response from other countries are greatly influenced by the geopolitical competition between Russia and Western nations, particularly the United States and the European Union.
While Russia has worked to fortify its ties with nations like China and Iran, Western nations have placed severe economic sanctions on Russia and offered military assistance to Ukraine which has embolden Ukraine to fight on.
The Middle East’s regional dynamics are significant in the Israel-Hamas conflict. In contrast to the backing Hamas receives from nations like Iran and Qatar, the US-Israel alliance is reinforced by substantial military and financial aid.
These alliances affect the UN’s capacity to effectively mediate disputes in addition to sustaining them. The UN is frequently criticized by both parties for allegedly being biased and applying different standards, which erodes the organization’s legitimacy and efficacy.
Structural Limitations.
The Structure of the UN Security Council
The UN’s inherent limitations on its capacity to effectively address disputes stem from the structure of the UN Security Council, namely the P5’s veto power. The post-World War II power dynamics that make up the Security Council’s composition are sometimes criticized for being out of date and inaccurately reflecting the geopolitical environment of today.
Due to this arrangement, the P5 are able to put their national interests ahead of international peace and security, which often results in passivity or poor crisis resolution.
For instance, Russia’s veto prevented the Security Council from passing a resolution denouncing Russia’s annexation of Crimea in the early phases of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
Similar to this, vetoes, mostly from the US, have prevented numerous resolutions that have called for ceasefires and investigations into human rights abuses in the Israel-Hamas war.
The UN’s capacity to respond to these situations with decisiveness and impartiality is severely hampered by this systemic restriction.
Limited Enforcement Mechanisms
The UN has a difficult time implementing resolutions, even when the Security Council is able to enact them.
The UN depends on member states to provide soldiers and funding for peacekeeping operations because it does not have a permanent armed force of its own.
This dependence frequently results in poor resources, sluggish deployment, and restricted operational efficacy.
For example, the UN’s peacekeeping efforts in Ukraine, which have been proposed in different forms since the conflict started, have not come to pass because member states cannot agree on anything and are reluctant to send troops into a conflict that is extremely volatile and politically sensitive.
The UN’s capacity to protect civilians and enforce ceasefires in the Israel-Hamas war is equally limited by the lack of strong enforcement tools and the requirement for collaboration from both parties and their allies.
Operational Challenges
Humanitarian Access and Protection
Making sure humanitarian aid reaches war areas and safeguarding civilians is one of the UN’s most important operational issues. Significant civilian losses and extensive humanitarian crises have occurred in both the Israel-Hamas conflict and the Russia-Ukraine war, making it more difficult for the UN to assist and support the impacted communities.
Millions of people have been displaced by the violence in Ukraine, creating a dire humanitarian situation.
Due to ongoing hostilities, access restrictions imposed by the conflicting parties, and infrastructure destruction, the UN’s humanitarian agencies, including the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), face significant challenges in delivering aid. The harsh winter weather and Russian military attacks on civilian infrastructure, including energy and water supplies, make these problems worse.
Similar challenges face the UN in delivering humanitarian relief to Gaza in the Israel-Hamas conflict, as the blockade enforced by Israel and Egypt limits the movement of products and services to the region. The ongoing conflicts, which include rocket assaults and aircraft bombardments, put civilians in even greater danger and make it more difficult to provide supplies.
The risks posed by humanitarian workers and the difficulties in maintaining civilian protection have been brought to light by the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), which has documented multiple instances of its facilities being damaged or destroyed during the conflict.
Political and Diplomatic Constraints
Political and diplomatic concerns frequently impede the UN’s attempts to arbitrate and settle disputes. The UN’s capacity to mediate and negotiate in the Russia-Ukraine war is constrained by the parties’ firmly held viewpoints as well as the larger geopolitical environment. Due to a lack of political will and mistrust between Russia and Ukraine, the Minsk Agreements, which were mediated by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) with UN backing, have failed to bring about enduring peace.
The political landscape in the region similarly limits UN mediation efforts in the Israel-Hamas conflict. The asymmetry of power between Israel and Hamas, the internal political dynamics within both parties, and the influence of regional actors have frequently undermined the
UNSCO’s (United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process) numerous attempts to mediate ceasefires and facilitate negotiations. The UN’s diplomatic efforts are made more difficult by the significant differences within the international community and the absence of a cohesive Palestinian leadership.
The Russia-Ukraine War
- ‘Security Council Deadlock’: After the conflict between Russia and Ukraine intensified in February 2022, the UN Security Council attempted to adopt a resolution denouncing Russia’s invasion and calling for the quick evacuation of Russian forces. But Russia blocked the resolution, using its veto authority, illustrating the Security Council’s incapacity to resolve the dispute.
‘Humanitarian Crisis’: The conflict’s terrible effects on civilians in Ukraine have been recognized by UN humanitarian agencies. By the end of 2022, the UNHCR estimates that over 6 million people had been internally displaced and an additional 5 million had fled to neighboring countries. Humanitarian activities have been significantly impeded by the continued fighting and loss of infrastructure, resulting in widespread displacement and suffering.
‘Sanctions and Diplomacy’: Resolutions denouncing Russia’s conduct and urging peace have been passed by the UN General Assembly, although they have no legal authority behind them.
In the meantime, Western nations have heavily sanctioned Russia in an effort to put pressure on Moscow to end hostilities. But these sanctions have also had a big impact on the economy, which has complicated diplomatic attempts and affected world markets.
Conclusion
The failure of the UN to put an end to the wars in Russia and Ukraine and Israel and Hamas is a complex problem with roots in geopolitical dynamics, structural constraints, and practical difficulties.
The UN faces challenges in these conflicts due to a variety of factors, including the P5’s veto power, geopolitical rivalries and alliances, the Security Council’s antiquated structure, the effectiveness of its enforcement mechanisms, and the intricate political and humanitarian conditions on the ground. Even while the UN is still vital in promoting peace, offering relief to those in need, and fostering communication, these major obstacles frequently limit the UN’s efficacy.
In order to address these problems, the international community must reaffirm its commitment to preserving the fundamental security and peace ideals found in the UN Charter.
This will need extensive reforms.
Writer’s email: brightkelvin289@gmail.com
PIX: Bright Kelvin Afeku-The Writer
(CONTINUE ON PAGE 5)
