Mrs Marietta Brew Appiah-Oppong

A spokesperson for the legal team of John Dramani Mahama in the ongoing presidential election petition and former Attorney-General, Mrs Marietta Brew Appiah-Oppong has accused the Supreme Court of endorsing “wishy-washy” arguments of the respondents in the case.

She said the ruling of the Court that witnesses of the respondents cannot be compelled to testify in the petition hearing is an endorsement of a namby-pamby argument mounted by lawyers of the Electoral Commission (EC) and President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo.

Speaking to journalists after court proceedings yesterday, the former Attorney-General said the seven-member panel of Judges hearing the petition failed to consider “compelling and superior” arguments of the lead lawyer for the petitioner, Mr Tsatsu Tsikata.

“You all followed the proceedings today and of course starting from Monday. On Monday, the petitioner closed his case after calling three witnesses. After closing his case, the respondents’ counsel informed the court that they had elected not to mount the witness box.

“What that meant was that the Chairperson of the EC, Jean Mensa, and the representatives of the 2nd respondent, Mr Mac Manu, were not going to mount the witness box to testify and be cross-examined by counsel for the petitioner, Mr Tsikata.

“You all recollect that they had filed witness statements in the case. So, naturally, counsel for the petitioner opposed this request or application by the respondents on the grounds that not only had they filed the witness statement but by two affidavits by which they opposed our request for them to answer interrogatories and for them to produce certain documents, the chairperson particularly had said she will be available for cross examination.

 “The petitioner’s point was that under the specific rule, Order 36, they [Respondents] had elected by this particular conduct to adduce evidence in court and, therefore, it was no longer open to them to tell the court that they were not going to give evidence.

“Of course, on Monday you heard the superior, compelling arguments by Mr Tsikata and, of course, you heard the wishy-washy arguments by the respondents. Nevertheless, the court had ruled in favour of the respondents, saying that they do not agree with us.”

The Supreme Court has told the parties involved in the petition hearing that the powers of the highest court of the land in electoral matters are limited.

Consequently, the Court said it cannot compel any witness in the ongoing hearing to mount the witness box to testify.

“We are minded to state that our jurisdiction to invoke this Election Petition is a limited jurisdiction, merely circumscribed by law. We do not intend to extend our mandate as the law report requires of us in such petition before us challenging the validity of the election of a president.

“Simply put, we are not convinced by the invitation being extended to us by Counsel for the petitioner to order the respondent to enter the witness box to be cross-examined.

“Accordingly, we hereby overrule the objection moved by Counsel for the petitioner against the decision of the respondents,” the Chief Justice Anin Yeboah said in a ruling on whether or not the Chair of the Electoral Commission (EC) can mount the witness box for cross examination.

Lawyer for the petitioner Mr Tsikata, after the court ruling on Thursday, served notice to re-open his case to enable him subpoena Chair of the Electoral Commission Jean Adukwei Mensa.

Mr Tsikata told the court that, “We are applying to reopen our case and on that basis we are issuing a subpoena addressed to the Chairperson of the Electoral Commission of Ghana. We also intend to apply for a review of the ruling.”

Hearing has been adjourned to Thursday, February 18.

Previous articleTsatsu Tsikata turns to subpoena after failed application to cross examine Jean Mensah
Next articlePolice Are Enforcing COVID-19 Protocols – ASP David Fianko-Okyere